This sounds horrible to say but one of my favorite sections of The Economist are the last-page obituaries. It's the last page, which is tasteful (who wants to read an obituary slammed between "Britain" and "Business"?), and often features a photo that remains seared in the mind for years to come.
I've always hated excess. Having more than necessary is irritating. Everything I spend time on lately, I do so wondering if this is something I'd consider a very good use of my finite and limited youth, and all things considered, partying, shopping, cultivating my online profile (ugggh) and obsessing over my body seem like colossally dumb ways to squander that time. Blogging is different.
The stories told are usually -- though not always -- of people I'd never even heard of until picking up that issue, only to realize what incredible, eventful, magic lives they'd led, filled with drama and struggle and triumphs along the way. It never feel sad for some reason even though they're dead: whether they die old or before their time, The Economist has a strange way of writing the story in such a way that it feels more like a joyous celebration than anything.
It gets me thinking about this life. How do I wish to live? I don't want to be the kind of famous person who gets written about after death in The Economist (though most people wouldn't mind) but reading these life stories does get one thinking about what the heck I'm achieving here. For the time being, it would sound something like this:
That would really kind of suck. If it were "crushed by a large mahogany bookshelf filled with her own (successful) travel-themed novels and books", that would be pretty cool.
"After a lifetime of surfing Etsy, writing and publishing some random stories that didn't net her very much profit and putting up illustrations on an obscure blog, Yukirat died at age 85 after being crushed by a large mahogany bookshelf."
That would really kind of suck. If it were "crushed by a large mahogany bookshelf filled with her own (successful) travel-themed novels and books", that would be pretty cool.
So what do I stand for? I loyally donate to causes like homelessness and poverty, hoping one day to help out in much bigger ways. Yet I've chosen a treacherous career path that would pretty much keep me a low-level donor until I become a mogul of some sort and monopolize the market. Really, being a writer today is a lot like picking the guitar in front of the train station: you get to live doing what you love, but don't count on retiring early.
I don't want a nice house, or nice things, or even children. A car is superfluous. Even a coffee-maker is irrelevant.
I've always hated excess. Having more than necessary is irritating. Everything I spend time on lately, I do so wondering if this is something I'd consider a very good use of my finite and limited youth, and all things considered, partying, shopping, cultivating my online profile (ugggh) and obsessing over my body seem like colossally dumb ways to squander that time. Blogging is different.
What I do want is an interesting life. To have seen and experienced a lot of things that capture the imagination and set the soul on fire. I want my eyes -- declining as they are in sight -- to soak up as much beauty as they can from all four corners of the world. I want to have started something new: there are a lot of impasses in the world. I want to come up with a solution theory and implement it as a new model for others to improve upon. I have stories boiling in my head that I want to get out on paper and post online, or publish if anyone is willing to read them. Obviously, the family and partner and dearest friends have to be taken care of. That is actually a full time job in and of itself when one wants to do it perfectly.
I'm writing one out in my diary. It's pretty much the kind of life I think would be awesome. The thirties and forties especially. Of course, God has plans. I'm not a planner, but dreaming up a rough manifesto of the kind of life I wish to lead makes me feel a lot better somehow.



